Paleo Dan

Eat, Work, Live and Play the Way that Nature intended.

Browsing Posts published in January, 2010

My Lipid Profile: January 18, 2010

1 comment

Notes 1/18/2010: First, I’ve been following a low-carb, high-fat paleo/primal diet with a macronutrient ratio of 70% fat, 20% protein, and 10% carbs for a while now. I’m sure, but haven’t checked, that includes more saturated fat than the USDA recommends in a week.

About two days before the blood draw, I ate from an all you can eat buffet. I stuck pretty close to paleo/primal foods, but I know that I got more carbs than normal and that the food was cooked in unhealthy fats. Not sure how much that would’ve skewed my results, but I’m not too worried in any case.

The nurse practitioner at the doctor’s office, though, is concerned though she is starting to think that my cholesterol numbers are due more to genetic variation than anything else… of course, she doesn’t know how I eat… I just told her that I eat “clean.” :)

Now some info about my numbers. Yeah, my total and LDL cholesterol numbers are up, but the numbers that matter most to me are down. For example, serum glucose is down almost 6%, my triglycerides are down over 17%, my HDL is up almost 19%, and my VLDL calc is down 20%. But, best of all, my ratio of triglycerides to HDL, which Dr. Eades considers most telling, is down over 30%!

Now, the nurse isn’t trying to push statins like she did last time, but she has requested an NMR profile be performed at my next blood test in six months.

Test Item “Normal” Range 01/09/09 09/28/09 01/18/10
Glucose, Serum (mg/dL) 65-99 89 86 81
Cholesterol, Total (mg/dL) 100-199 262 192 235
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 0-149 108 99 82
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) >39 40 43 51
VLDL Cholesterol Calc (mg/dL) 5-40 22 20 16
LDL Cholesterol Calc – “Friedewald” (mg/dL) [1][3] 0-99 200.40 129.20 167.60
LDL Cholesterol Calc – “Iranian” (mg/dL) [2][3] 0-99 202.65 136.36 156.27
HDL/LDL Ratio – “Friedewald” 0.200 0.333 0.304
HDL/LDL Ratio – “Iranian” 0.197 0.315 0.326
Triglycerides/HDL Ratio [4] <5.00 2.70 2.30 1.61
C-reactive Protein (mg/L) [5] 0.0-4.9 0.3 0.3 0.5

[1] Friedewald method described here: http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/6/499

[2] Iranian method described here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18426324

[3] Calculator available: http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~geoff36/LDL_mg.htm

[4] This is based upon information found in The 6-Week Cure from Drs. Michael and Mary Dan Eades. From the book: The most meaningful lipid value predictor of heart disease risk is clearly the ratio of triglycerides divided by HDL. A number over 5 warns of increased risk; a number below 5 is a good sign, and the further below, the better.

[5] C-reactive protein is a measure of inflammation in the body: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-reactive_protein

Note: I started these posts before I started reading Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes. I’ve never been overly concerned by cholesterol numbers, but I care even less now. I will, however, continue to track my numbers. Mainly so people will be able to see what eating a high fat (50-65%) diet will do to these numbers. By the way, one of my favorite cheat snacks is one serving (4 sqaures) of a Lindt 90% cocoa “Supreme Dark” chocolate with two tablespoons of coconut oil. That is a 470 kcal snack that is 48g (85%) fat (37g of that is saturated), 14g (11%) carbs, and 5g (4%) protein. Side note, I love coconut oil. I put it on everything.

Note: Prior to my blood test in May, I had not been eating well or working out. In fact, I had been sick off and on (more on than off) since November ‘08. I’ve been paleo-esque for about a month now and trying to hold to a stricter paleo diet going forward from here. We’ll see what the numbers show…

Note 10/7/09: Supposedly C-reactive protein (CRP) is also an indicator of heart disease… at least that’s what my doctor thinks. I’ve got to wonder though. If my total cholesterol was 262 mg/dL which the AHA says is “high risk”, that must mean my risk of heart disease was elevated. If that’s the case, shouldn’t my CRP have been elevated? Oh well, I’ll track it anyway just for the fun of it. If fat, especially saturated fat, is bad, then my cholesterol should go up which should start hurting my heart and cause my CRP to elevate. We shall see.

Status Update

No comments

I have been bad about not updating this blog. I’ve been spending too much time on Twitter, DailyMile, and Facebook. I’ll try to do better about that in the future…

So, now on to today’s post…

Back in September, I posted my current stats and ideal weight calculation from Body-Mass Index, Waist-to-Height Ratio and More…. Since that time, I’ve lost about 30 pounds and 9 inches off my waist. My Waist-to-Height Ration (WHtR) was reduced 12.2%.

via http://home.fuse.net/clymer/bmi/

via http://home.fuse.net/clymer/bmi/

According to research by David Willoughby, the ideal WHtR for athletes is 45.8%. I’m about halfway there with 12.7% left to go. That would put me at 208 pounds with a 34 inch waist. The worst part is that, at my ideal weight of 208, I would be considered borderline obese using the standard BMI measure.

Progress Images

4 comments
Combined-Small-2010-01-16-247.8

Jan 16, 2010 @ 247.8 lbs

Nov 18, 2009 @ 260.4 lbs

Nov 18, 2009 @ 260.4 lbs

Sep 21, 2009 @ 273.2 lbs

Sep 21, 2009 @ 273.2 lbs

Aug 18, 2009 @ 287.5 lbs

Aug 18, 2009 @ 287.5 lbs

Oct 11, 2004 @ 315 lbs

Oct 11, 2004 @ 315 lbs

Race Report: 2010 Hair of the Dog 5K

1 comment

Another 5K, another PR… sort of.

The Hair of the Dog 5k is a New Year’s Day race. To allow for the previous night’s festivities, the start wasn’t until 10 AM. That was mighty nice of the organizers. :)

I went into this 5K with a goal of 30 minutes or better. The big problem with that goal was the 9:39 miles that go along with it. A few weeks before this race, I had run a mile as fast as I could and ended up running about a 9:30. So asking for 3.1 miles at 9:39/mile was going to be pushing it.

Well, to make a long boring story short and, well, still quite boring, I ran a 29:40 (29:39.89 official chip time) which, at the time, I thought was a PR (more on that in a few). I kept the splits on my trusty Timex Race Trainer: 9:26, 9:39, 9:50 and a 0:46 tenth (7:40).

OK, so is it a PR or not?

No, not technically. I ran a 29:16 on a 5K in Cary, NC back in April of 2006, the Cary Road Race. The thing, though, is that back in ‘06 I was probably 40 pounds lighter than I was on 1/1/10. I’ve got to figure that 40 pounds makes more than a 24 second difference on 5K times… right?

Overall, I’m happy with my performance and quite excited to see how the rest of the year progresses. At this point, I’m debating whether or not to run a 14K next month, the Virginia is for Lovers 14K. I also have a sprint triathlon scheduled for my birthday, 7/10/10: the Triangle Triathlon.

View the entry for this race on my dailymile profile.

Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2010 Paleo Dan Design by SRS Solutions